Some people believe that Countries should produce food for the whole population and import as little food as possible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is essential for a human’s body to receive an adequate amount of meal to regulate the normal body function. It is believed by some that enough food should be cultivated to feed the whole population, and have less food exported from the other countries. I do not completely agree with this statement.
Undoubtedly, crops ploughed in homeland field will definitely be relatively cheaper. Ultimately, it would be affordable and fulfil the need of a large section of the society. For example, milk production in India is done on a vast scale that is why it is readily available at a favourable cost to the people. Therefore, it is certainly the best idea to strive to yield sufficient supplies to suffice the need of the nation’s human-beings.
However, on the other hand, all types of grains in one country cannot be produced which are staple. As many factors like climate change and different weather conditions are responsible for the successful agricultural. There are a plethora of vegetations which cannot be nurtured in colder regions. Moreover, they require only hot and humid areas to thrive. For instance, rice farming is impossible in arid grounds and harvest only in tropical and coastal lands. As a result, permitting the transportation of small quantities of eatables would not satiate the necessities of the mankind.
To sum up,To meet the dietary expectations of the people, it is of utmost importance to buy essentials in bulk from abroad. Nonetheless, there are, of course, myriads of benefits involved in harvesting ample of vegetables and fruits for the citizens.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ible in arid grounds and harvest only in tropical and coastal lands. As a result,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, of course, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04743083004 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90018399307 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648221343874 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9625866924 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.416666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149849363608 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042482623675 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641427761976 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818780911573 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075474083917 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.