In current scenario, unprecedented technological advancements have modernized the present generation. Considering the facts, any nation demonstrates tremendous enthusiasm and displays extraordinary growth and development when its population include multiculturalism. I strongly disagree that cultural diversity plays a pivotal role in betterment and growth of any nation.
Commencing the discussion, nowadays, there are numerous hindrances in the promotion of multicultural environment. Firstly, people suffer discrimination on the basis of caste, colour and creed. Besides, this further invites the narrow feelings of anti nationalism causing communal riots and provoke orthodox religious misconceptions that results in deterioration of national growth and advancement. For instance, unprecedented protests were witnessed in India against the implementation of unconstitutional bills (NRC and CAB) passed by the Indian government that apparently excluded the Muslims. Thus, ideological differences cause nuisances and hinders the growth and development of any country. Apart from this, casteism and anti-national emotions are propagated but national interest and economic growth is neglected.
Further elucidating my perspective, linguistic diversification also plays a noticeable role in creating obstacles in the path of progress of any country. Diverse states prefer their own regional language where as deliberately neglect other Native languages. For instance, inhabitants of Kerala promote English but reject Hindi as a national language. Also, natives of Punjab favour their regional language but spontaneously turns oblivious towards Hindi. Thus, multilingual diversity can be considered a titanic absurd in the development of the country.
To recapitulate, multicultural diversity as well as linguistic diversification can be considered the major problems in upliftment of the national interest. Narrow nationalism causes negligence towards the patriotism and becomes a stumbling block in the growth of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...st and economic growth is neglected. Further elucidating my perspective, linguistic ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ates prefer their own regional language where as deliberately neglect other Native langu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, well, apart from, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.3731884058 5.12529762239 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5161638788 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641304347826 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3708653148 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.9375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159582292948 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486464519879 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527427587569 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999831915537 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555186212505 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.38 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.37 12.4159519038 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.