Some people believe that each countries provide poorer countries with other types of help rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that developed countries provide financial aid to poverty nations to solve various extreme issues except for economic problems for several reasons. I believe that wealthy countries should help them in other ways.
On the one hand, several reasons explain why providing financial is the best way to help undeveloped nations. First and foremost, the government can swiftly tackle short-term or temporary problems so they can focus on other issues, such as deforestation and animal testing, and boost their economy. Furthermore, aid provides those living in extreme poverty with the essential resources necessary to attain a better standard of living. As a result, humans can treat each other equally and meet all their needs.
On the other hand, I still believe that wealthy countries should fund in different ways, such as education and health systems, instead of giving finances. The first sector is education is considered a potential career in various nations. These days, qualifications and certifications are a part of job requirements. But in undeveloped countries, it is hard to access a good environment and study; for instance, teachers in remote areas do not have enough knowledge to teach children. As a result, rich nations should invest in more professional teachers and modern facilities to ensure the quality of learning. Nevertheless, it is challenging to go to hospital when people are sick or allergic due to the dangerous topographic, and far distance. Investing in buildings like schools and hospitals which involve the locals would help them earn, and these buildings are primary tools through which new generations are fostered and developed.
To conclude, I think that developed countries provide another type of help, such as providing food for poor people or free medical check-ups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'going', 'gonna'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: going; gonna
...arning. Nevertheless, it is challenging to go to hospital when people are sick or all...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, except for, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35191637631 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88868036586 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613240418118 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6511415107 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237142027721 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721043989426 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708312232028 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155748392928 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598204650873 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.