Some people believe that each countries provide poorer countries with other types of help rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that developed countries provide financial aid to poverty nations to solve various extreme issues except for economic problems for several reasons. I agree with the point that wealthy countries should help them in other ways.
On the one hand, several reasons explain why providing financial is the best way to help poor nations. Firstly, the government can swiftly tackle short-term or temporary problems so they can focus on other issues such as deforestation, health, and animal testing, and boost their economy. Furthermore, aid provides those living in extreme poverty with the essential resources necessary to attain a better standard of living. As a result, everyone in the world can treat equally and meet all their need.
On the other hand, I still believe that wealthy countries should fund in different ways such as education and health systems, instead of giving finances. The first sector is education which is considered a potential career in various nations. These days, qualifications and certifications are a part of job requirements. But in poor countries, it is hard to access a good environment and study; for instance, teachers in remote areas do not have enough knowledge to teach children. As a result, rich nations should invest in more professional teachers and modern facilities to ensure the quality of learning. Nevertheless, it can be seen that it is hard to go to the hospital when they are sick or allergic due to the dangerous topographic, and far distance. Investing in buildings like schools and hospitals which involve the locals would help them earn, and these buildings are primary tools through which new generations are fostered and developed.
To conclude, I think that developed countries provide another type of help like providing food for poor people or free medical check-ups
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, except for, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19932432432 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81736299406 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597972972973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2596526436 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21569630505 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066635872419 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778627139942 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14997632363 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748069289394 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.