Some people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In many occasion, dressing always be considered as a very important part. An employee who dress properly even be seen by its employers as a men with ability. I agree that one’s dressing tastes is important but it should not be the points that decide his or her employment.
On the one hand, appropriate dressing is essential in a professional setting. People should not be allowed to wear too casual clothes on formal occasions, especially some important meeting, in case that those colleagues who work with you will feel uncomfortable. Also, some people said that well-dressed workers can give benefits to workplace, if only for image reasons. Many employers believe that workers who dress uniform can more effectively communicate corporate image to investors or partners. So in many financial companies whose employees have regular face-to-face communication with customers, dress uniform is essential.
On the other hand, it is biased to judge the competence of employees only by their clothes. Professional capabilities and working efficiency are the primary condition on which interviewers make employment decisions. Actually, it is the skills and how well the worker can finish job that really dictates how much they can contribute to company. In contrast, those who only know how to dress well and impressively are not important. Moreover, paying too much attention to dressing might even affect workers’ concentration on work and decrease their working enthusiasm, which make matters worse.
To conclude, appropriate dressing is a minimal requirement for people who work in workplace. But the ability and working efficiency is more important than that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun occasion seems to be countable; consider using: 'many occasions'.
Suggestion: many occasions
In many occasion, dressing always be considered as a ver...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a man' or simply 'men'?
Suggestion: a man; men
...operly even be seen by its employers as a men with ability. I agree that one's d...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: MAN_MEN[1]
Message: 'man' is the singular form of 'men'. Consider using 'man'?
Suggestion: man
...erly even be seen by its employers as a men with ability. I agree that one's d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, moreover, really, so, thus, well, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49615384615 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07792291448 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8434671333 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262986407958 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842656022283 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424851611197 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152772561616 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316277639163 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.