Some people argue that researching outer space remains crucial since it provides considerable insights and could subject to numerous innovations that will aid human beings in the course of time. Others claim that investigating space is unfruitful. Hence, capital ought to be laid out in tackling urgent issues poverty and sound pollution. In my opinion, both pressing troubles and space exploration must be accepted as the key importance. This essay will support my opinion with relevant examples.
To begin with, thanks to the space study, satellites are proved to be one of the best blessings for the human kinds in the worldwide. Typhoons in Bangladesh in the year 2008 would be a good example where nearly all citizens were moved to a safe place owing to the utilisation of space stations as opposed to the year 1950 that witnessed approximately two thirds of the citizens in the same village of Chittagong succumbed to deaths. In addition, new raw materials, which form a solid basis for ready cash, have been discovered. The moon, for instance, is rich in helium 3 that has the potential to be used as a fuel. Therefore, it ascertains why space probe sounds true worths for human beings.
Besides, it is worth stressing that impoverishment and impairment need to be addressed too because it is growing in astounding ways. 25 percent of mortality is secondary to poverty related illnesses such as malaria and tuberculosis according to the report. If government drained wealth on health cares and free vocational trainings, the poverty rates could be possibly combatted and the life expectancy would be prolonged. Next, increasing sound pollution resulting from machines, industries and vehicles is hampering the daily activities of humans. So, these problems can be solved readily provided that the authority concentrates finances on building sound proof fences and good designs of roads.
In conclusion, exploring space and dealing paramount obstacles prove eminently worthwhile because of the accurate estimation of the weather, unlimited natural resources, longevity and reformed routine activities.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: If government drained wealth on health cares and free vocational trainings, the poverty rates could be possibly combatted and the life expectancy would be prolonged.
Error: combatted Suggestion: combated
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 333 350
No. of Characters: 1738 1500
No. of Different Words: 219 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.272 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.219 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.817 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 129 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 108 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.812 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.138 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.274 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.487 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.026 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36336336336 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89382620175 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663663663664 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4226838696 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233235857135 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666479670157 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630635341812 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129314280815 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734624402653 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.