Some people believe that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.
Verbal communication is thought to be more impactful than non-verbal ones, such as writing. As powerful as oral communication can be, yet I firmly believe that written communication is capable of yielding that same effect.
With regard to several people's opinion, direct word exchange between people can create such influence on the listeners. Through verbal speeches, especially coming from celebrities or influencers, the general public's view about a certain subject can be reshaped and refined. Without empowering speeches coming from activists or politicians, it would take the majority of the public a long time to be informed about global crises, such as global warming, a widespread virus infection or economic corruption, etc, and their alarming rates. Thus, these speakers equip the listeners with sufficient knowledge and raise their awareness, as well as reformed their opinions about worldwide issues. Face-to-face communication occurs everywhere in a person's life, yet it can be life-changing and very inspirational. A piece of advice coming from a stranger, or an acquaintance can help an unemployed person get back on their feet and start their life again;even a small conversation with friends in a cafe can spark ideas and imagination to a novelist struggling with writer-block.
On the other hand, written communication, in my opinion, can also influence the readers as strongly as verbal communication. Written communication can be a substitution for oral communication in several scenarios, where the latter fails to convey the writer's intended meaning. Most of people feel embarrassed or frightened of confessing their loves to their loved ones, it is indeed impossible to express their feelings without sweating or stuttering. Hence, only writing a letter or texting can let them express themselves. Beyond that, written communication is reserved on a materialistic object, which makes several inspirational quotes more long-lasting in a person's memory. A sentence coming from a friend in a daily conversation can generate motivation for a person, as it has been discussed above. However, if that person does not hold on to that empowering sentence for long, it can be forgotten and they can forget what their goal is. If that sentence is in the form of a text or a letter, the person can always read the sentence again and again whenever they feel unmotivated or dreadful, to remind themselves what they are working hard for.
In the end, whether it is verbal communication or written communication, I think that with a wise selection of words and topics, both can be motivating and empowering to the target audience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 741, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ce communication occurs everywhere in a persons life, yet it can be life-changing and v...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...to convey the writers intended meaning. Most of people feel embarrassed or frightened of confe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 664, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...irational quotes more long-lasting in a persons memory. A sentence coming from a friend...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, i think, such as, as well as, in my opinion, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35406698565 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16060127599 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555023923445 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1724136323 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.647058824 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5882352941 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144522185088 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546363717784 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045011471805 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10328049513 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238273971858 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.