Some people believe that government should ban dangerous sports such as skydiving and rock climbing. Do you agree or disagree?
Sports play the astronomical role in the society. Some masses ponder that, authority should restrict on sports, those are harmful for human lives. However, I disagree with the laid statement with surrounding arguments, which are discussed in ensuing paragraphs.
The most obvious reason, I put forward is that, instead of banned on dangerous sports, regime should make rules and regulation to overcome the harmful effect. For instance, government could organised an institute, which helps people to give training under the strict supervision as well as provide specific knowledge regarding particular sports. Apart from this, authority could spend handsome amount of money to enhance safety by giving modern amenities and safety equipment.
The another reason is that, people can earn their name by playing such games, like skydiving, rock climbing and many others. Also they can make frame to own nation and survive for it. Furthermore, by pursuing these type of sports as a career, they can get abundance of knowledge i their field and boost their confidence and many other abilities.
However, opponents viewers believe that, dangerous sports should be banned. The argue that, by playing such type of sports, is very harmful for not only players but also audiences. For example, there are many race related games, which affect on audiences as well, while occurring big accident, even some times people lost their lives. Moreover, they also argue that regime should invest more money to enhance public infrastructure, so it would very helpful for all the citizens by enjoying all the public facilities.
In conclusion, although there are few risk of playing dangerous sports, the positive are more, therefore, I believe that regime should encourage people to play such games by providing modern amenities as well as safety equipment and highly trained supervisors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'organise'
Suggestion: organise
... effect. For instance, government could organised an institute, which helps people to giv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ydiving, rock climbing and many others. Also they can make frame to own nation and s...
^^^^
Line 9, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eer, they can get abundance of knowledge i their field and boost their confidence...
^^
Line 13, column 77, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...hat, dangerous sports should be banned. The argue that, by playing such type of sports, i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 236, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...here are many race related games, which affect on audiences as well, while occurring big ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 35, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun risk seems to be countable; consider using: 'few risks'.
Suggestion: few risks
... In conclusion, although there are few risk of playing dangerous sports, the positi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, even so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41836734694 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58834598074 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598639455782 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6441176325 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.785714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192471468935 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642704838808 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509156297648 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103203503341 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237916857813 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.