It is argued by people that government has a responsibility to enact laws about people’s nutrition and food choice, while some people have the opposite consider. In my opinion, both sides are of paramount importance in equal measure and this essay will state my preference.
According to proponents of governmental legislations, as a number of people especially young people have a preference for consuming junk foods and soft drinks rather than healthy eating habits, this contributes to the rising levels of obesity among children in many major cities. Therefore, it is necessary for each government to minimize unhealthy diets by enacting laws that not only reduce foods containing tremendous amounts of sugar and salt but also encourage vegetable and meat suppliers to sell their products at lower prices for customers. By doing these steps, the authority offers healthier solutions to individuals, and thus, decreases the risks of metabolic diseases including diabetes
However, despite some beneficial consequences mentioned above, selecting foods and nutrition should be a personal issue only. This is because individuals’ tastes and preferences vary distinctly from person to person which makes it virtually impossible to enact the most judicious food regulations for everyone. For example, those who go to the gym six days a week prefer eat-clean habits by consuming more protein and fewer grease foods, whereas labor workers, who use massive amounts of energy to make jobs done during the day, need to consume a ton of foods and nutrition. Besides, food demand should not just be investigated through purely scientific spectacles because it is also a matter of spontaneity. In such cases, restriction of food choices would be equivalent to deprivation of personal liberty and gratification.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that although both sides are important in the same measure, food should only be a matter of personal choice. The extent of government intervention should be confined to the role of just a credible nutritional consultant for the public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 698, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of metabolic diseases including diabetes However, despite some beneficial consequ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41176470588 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99486920148 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640866873065 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.2450803141 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.909090909 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3636363636 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207026493422 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810586244451 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637064656679 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137351570823 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642060871423 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.