Bad moments in life teach various lessons and one must be open to look for them. While some believe that a person should accept his fate as it is, others hold the opinion that one must make efforts and make the situation better. This essay will discuss both sides using some examples before reaching any conclusion.
Accepting a situation brings a sense of peace. One must always hold on to faith that every night will end. These are the beliefs held by one section of society. They claim that periods of dismay and disappointment must be left as they are. The reason is that, working on the bad situations may or may not bring desired results. For instance, if a person works in an irksome company that does not pay him a good amount of money, he should still continue working in it. Feeling of anticipation will only worsen the situation and if he leaves the job, there is certainty of getting any other occupation. In order to avoid these types of situations, a person should accept the situation, pent-up his avdersarial emotions and keep going on as ultimately, these times will end for good.
However, other people believe that agreeing to the fate will not bring any contentment and a person is always responsible if he gets stuck in bad times and can not make any good out of it. They believe that even though, improving the situation seems impossible, attempts should always be made to do so. Taking an example from my personal experience, one of my cousin applied to get a certain type of job position in a company. There were other two people who applied for the same position as well. One of the three got selected and the other two, including her, had to look for other jobs. My sister gave up on the job and got stressed as she started to think that it was her fate. On the other side, the second person who got rejected, improved on his mistakes which were pointed out by the interviewers. When he got back for the interview after improving his mistakes, he got the job of higher position as employers saw the potential in him.
No matter how hard the situation might seem, one should always make efforts to improve it because sometimes, rejection just means redirection, towars a better destination.
To conclude, although both ideologies have their own points to claim about, the latter perspective seems more appropriate to me. Opportunities comes to those who are not just willing to take failures, but also to work on them.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, second, so, still, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6766743649 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50834469691 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547344110855 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3849406972 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0454545455 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6818181818 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.59090909091 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193532541732 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569825939074 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508482743642 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105370221396 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549794748051 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, second, so, still, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 433.0 315.596192385 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6766743649 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50834469691 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547344110855 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3849406972 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0454545455 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6818181818 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.59090909091 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193532541732 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569825939074 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508482743642 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105370221396 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549794748051 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.