Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Acceptance of undesired situation may be true in an inevitable reality matter. Continuing of the job which cannot get any satisfactory option can be challenging in the long run because job satisfaction and personal development are paramount for every person.
In the one hand, people have to accept the reality in some situation which cannot be avoided. However, current people tend to accept the situation which cannot offer higher job satisfaction although that job is unsatisfying and financially inconvenient. It may be due to that they do not want to take risk and make innovation and want to live on the stream. That will correct for who follow the normal flow because they are accustomed with such kind of bad situation like financial problem. Sometimes, people are reluctant to change and take challenge for future development because of laziness.
On the other hand, people who want to improve the career try to assess the current situation whether the necessary part comes from and other matters like boring from repetition of daily routine. Moreover they propose the possible lists of solution to superior and if a person’s need is personal development, firstly those people fill their gap and find the alternative solution to the current problem. Therefore, those people take risk and overcome obstacles and get higher job satisfaction. However, dissatisfaction for those people in the workplace is not financial matter and they only expect recognition from the superior and positive working condition.
In conclusion, we can encounter two types of people in the everyday life such as the one who wish to follow the current flow and another people who want to face the challenge for improvement. In my opinion, people should not stay in the comfort zone and should take risk where necessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ve on the stream. That will correct for who follow the normal flow because they are...
^^^
Line 9, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...oring from repetition of daily routine. Moreover they propose the possible lists of solu...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84401747079 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.078498266 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.923076923 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145344208537 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544147401035 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297770257133 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088711282785 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173961723612 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.