Sharing information has been prevalent among different fields in the society, be it education, science and technology, and commerce or so. However, some people often argue that certain information should be withheld rather than sharing to others. In my view, I firmly believe that sharing information is beneficial to the society and individuals. My opinion would be elaborated as follows.
People believe sharing information is conducive to the society because it could facilitate the collaboration between the people and cooperation of different institution or company. In terms of scientific research, scientists could exchange and communicate with each other by sharing information about their findings of the experiments. This could boost the collaboration of the scientists and therefore, stimulate more useful discover or invention which is useful and advantageous to the public. For instance, by sharing information about the resistance of the bacteria , scientists are capable of innovating new medication against the illness. Hence, sharing information is vitally paramount.
On the other hand, the opponents deem that some information should not be shared due to the fact that it incurs conflicts of invasion of copy right. This suggests that some people or enterprises would withhold their precious information in order to avoid their information being utilized as a way to earn profits. This is particularly true in the business in Taiwan─Technology industry in terms of electronics witnesses increasing scenario of plagiarism. These firms attempt to copy or emulate their way of production for lucrative purpose. As a result, sharing information could pose negative effect on society.
All in all, I reiterate my opinion that sharing information is surely favorable to the society. However, it inevitably precipitate adverse ramification to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion about the resistance of the bacteria , scientists are capable of innovating ne...
^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'precipitates'?
Suggestion: precipitates
... to the society. However, it inevitably precipitate adverse ramification to the society.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70714285714 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2293211892 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4421941439 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.875 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362669782527 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120835277802 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811116192925 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211479201024 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076747833805 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.