Technology growth and communication tools cause preserving invaluable information more challenging. However, some people assume that publishing them are more useful than keeping them secure but it seems to me that it is better to preserve them, and I will explain why.
On the one hand, those who support the idea of sharing information believe that most of the activities in science, business and academic world are done in order to improve current conditions and make the world better place for living regardless of profits that inject to the pocket of some organizations. Therefore, adding to the knowledge of public by publishing some information, they would increase the general information in different fields. However, they have a simplistic view on this issue because sharing information can have irreversible consequences for individuals and countries.
On the other hand, in academic world, students and researchers concentrate on their field of studies and have non-stop effort on their researches in laboratories trying to find more liable results. Therefore, if they share the results of their work without submitting them in a journal, others can plagiarize their all year-round efforts and manipulate them. Then, all of their effort and valuable time spending on doing projects are neglected easily. Furthermore, in scientific and business world, there are a huge amount of money and budgets invested in projects in order to encourage teams and increase the efficiency beside considering the profits that will deserve the money invested. Abolishing the privacy of results, let competing companies and frauds to copy the ideas, and instead of investing on novelties think about the quality of advertising and better presentation of products. This can significantly increase the benefits of these kinds of companies, leading to bankruptcy of companies which the ideas are originally for them.
To conclude, I tend to side with the opponents of sharing information because it waste time, wealth and effort of talented people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...ic and business world, there are a huge amount of money and budgets invested in projec...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wastes'?
Suggestion: wastes
...nents of sharing information because it waste time, wealth and effort of talented peo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47003154574 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95667919386 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577287066246 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9801988024 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213508001249 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688132376158 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557484735234 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12333241031 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663780381408 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.