In this modern era, sharing information is something that is commonly done between people. Some people opine that it is acceptable to share information where others opine that information should be protected. I completely agree with both views and will explain the reasons.
On the one side, information should be shared to help others progressing. Some people may need information that we have in order to accomplish something. Hence, if we share these information to them, they will be able to get what they want to achieve. For instance, a thesis advisor has done research in the same topic with what her thesis student chooses. In order to help her thesis student to finish her thesis, she shared the information about her research as a reference. Consequently, this information has helped her thesis student to finish his thesis faster.
On the other hand, protecting information that we have is also important. This is because, some information are not easily obtained. Thus, it is best to protect them to respect the owner of the information and to maintain the value of an information. For example, someone has done a research about the effect of playing games to working performance among Canada employees. Because the information about this topic is still rare and he did that research with a lot of efforts, he wants to protect this information by making this journal a paid-version journal. Then those who are really interested about this information can pay and read about his journal, so the information won't be shared carelessly.
In conclusion, I agree that sharing information is good because it can help others progressing while protecting information is also necessary because some information are not easily acquired.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...ccomplish something. Hence, if we share these information to them, they will be able to get what ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...ormation. For example, someone has done a research about the effect of playing games to wo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, may, really, so, still, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1514084507 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89463819359 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503521126761 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9621007552 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293496725969 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116068694542 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724986480656 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216952619996 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445930043517 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.