Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
These days, people have different views with regard to the question about sharing specialized knowledge consisting of aspects that relate to science, trading, and educational basis. Many opine that the more information is published, the better level of intellectuality people get, there is, however a strong counter-argument that those forms of data had better be kept confidential. From my perspective, I totally agree with the second outlook.
Initially, scientific accomplishments could be productively achieved when there are no approaching barriers. It is undeniable the collaboration of well-educated people and freely accessible information will generate a number of opportunities for people to acquire widespread knowledge. Owing to the involvement of humans, many significant ideas that useful for the world’s upcoming development are now revealed. This leads to the fruitful solving problem that the sole head could not attain. Wikipedia, for instance, is a collection of data contributed by freely accessible by humans and it irrefutably enables people to possess multinational information.
Notwithstanding, the negative impacts of sharing data also need to be scrutinized. Some particular types of information which is openly published may provoke a number of considerable problems, especially, the devastating of society. The leaking out of the data related to nuclear, poison is predicted to initiate the terrorist as the structure and chemical elements are revealed and facilitate the emergent of the bomb. Likewise, sharing information regarding business freely are able to cause artificial enterprises. It is pointed that the shared data could be abused by scammers with the view to swindling consumers.
In conclusion, although the free permission of information-approached comprise many quoted benefits, some demerits are still worth minding, especially, the severe destruction of the entire civilization.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s with the view to swindling consumers. In conclusion, although the free permiss...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, look, may, regarding, second, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93214285714 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50235889896 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635714285714 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0132959917 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216555676258 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065979072307 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495419987216 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115793475078 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430530463144 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s with the view to swindling consumers. In conclusion, although the free permiss...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, look, may, regarding, second, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93214285714 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50235889896 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635714285714 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0132959917 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216555676258 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065979072307 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495419987216 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115793475078 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430530463144 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.