Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea.
What are the reasons and solutions?
These days, deterring animals from coping with the risk of being perished is implied to give an imperative boost in ecosystem development. The animals’ extinction has recently attested to stem from human influence on both the continents and aquatic settings. With an intention to put an end to this issue, some productive formula will be depicted in this essay.
Initially, it is undeniable that human negative impacts are the fundamental catalysts for the disappearance of many species. To meet people’s demands, an immense number of trees are overly cut down prompting the destruction of animal’s habitats. Eventually, owing to over-exploiting oceanic oil, the marine environment is also severely contaminated. Natural breeds, consequently, are obligated to adapt to an utterly odd living place that is inappropriate to their innate traits and gradually lose their surviving capability. Additionally, to account for the extinction of many rare species, illegally hunting is considered the premier reason. Dozens of scarce animals are commonly hunted, purchased to the zoo, and become a notable revenue-generating tool.
Aiming to solve these quoted matters, some feasible solutions are expected to be carried out outright. People’s respect for preserving flora and fauna rules had better be emphasized by the authority through many rational fines. Those penalties can be served as a strong deterrent against illegal poaching and are published as a serious warning for unconscious hunters. Furthermore, beneficial forums, propaganda are expected to be widespread organized. This social assistance enables people to acquire cognitions concerning the environment and supports them to possess a high consciousness of conservation on living creatures and especially, endangered animals.
In conclusion, being intimidated by the extinction of animals is a worth-contemplating issue that may provoke the disorder of ecosystem and biodiversity. Hence, the mentioned formulas need to be urgently and commonly put into force.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...tive boost in ecosystem development The animals extinction has recently attested to ste...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'forums'' or 'forum's'?
Suggestion: forums'; forum's
...onscious hunters Furthermore beneficial forums propaganda are expected to be widesprea...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, may, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62876254181 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16420130305 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642140468227 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 299.0 20.2975951904 1473% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1683.0 106.682146367 1578% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 299.0 20.7667163134 1440% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 62.0 7.06120827912 878% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168303584829 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168303584829 0.084324248473 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915684313781 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520930605669 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 154.6 13.0946893788 1181% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -257.39 50.2224549098 -512% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 123.4 11.3001002004 1092% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.85 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.8 8.58950901804 289% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 9.78957915832 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 121.6 10.1190380762 1202% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 155.0 10.7795591182 1438% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.