Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Today’s we are living in the modern time where people do have access to the internet in the fingertip. One can gain the excess of recent research through the internet. Sharing the latest fiding can be boon as well as crush so we need to take precursors before sharing it. I will be examining both sides in this writing.
We are living in the concept of the global village today. There is numerous research going on day by day by scientists and scholars in their field of study. We are in the excess of the internet today which is one of the great inventions which is believed to be used by American Army in World War II. If this innovation was not shared with the common people in 1990 then people around the world would receive the information and other things promptly.
Another benefit of free information to the research is we can get a fresh idea which is replacing past theory with a new one. Previously, students were taught that this earth is round, however, now the reached has been proved that earth is oval. The same idea will be applied in the business too. New software and business theories help an entrepreneur to excel in their company’s revenue.
Having said that there are multiple benefits of free scientific research there are lot more drawbacks to it too. We are living in the virtual world where we can watch out everything by sitting in one corner. If scientists share the formula of Nuclear bomb-making then this can be used by everyone. Negative people use this weapon to destroy the world in the second.
The same thing will be applied in the business and education stream too. Hackers are a major headache in today world for national securities. If the hacking formula is shared with everything then the situation will be vulnerable. Banks and the Stock market will be affected most by this.
So, looking for both side, we should only offer the ethical and good information with common people. Research in which citizens will be benefited should be shared and other research needs to be restricted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that young people should have university education this will bring benifiy to society others believe that it will lead to graduate unemployment discus both view and give opinion 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 61
- Does technology helps people? To what extend do you agree? 61
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. 78
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 95, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'day by'.
Suggestion: day by
...ay. There is numerous research going on day by day by scientists and scholars in their field ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ut everything by sitting in one corner. If scientists share the formula of Nuclear...
^^
Line 10, column 143, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...in today world for national securities. If the hacking formula is shared with ever...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75630252101 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50963822482 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515406162465 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0816769177 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.1818181818 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2272727273 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.40909090909 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258086924358 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724803204777 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558756833924 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14014845361 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327375505589 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.