Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature and history of their own country, rather than the literature and history of other countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people differ on the idea that youngsters should learn their national literature and history rather than that of other countries. I concur with this idea by the following explanations.
On the one hand, by studying traditional literature, children might develop their cultural identity. In fact, when a Japanese child read a haiku poem, which is a traditional Japanese literary work, he or she will imagine and acknowledge the author’s experiences. This means that the children might learn about the tradition as well as the cultural differences between them and the previous generations. Therefore, youngsters can create their own identity through these experiences. In addition, discovering the past of a country also helps young people be grateful to all the sacrifices of their ancestors. As students learn about the battle protecting the homeland, children might realize what they have nowadays was paid by the lives of the previous generations.
On the other hand, teaching world history and literature might have some potential drawbacks. Firstly, world history undeniably places more pressure on homework than the history of a single country. In order to understand about international past events, learners have to know a broad context which probably involved with many countries. For example, there were more than 30 countries might be related to the second world war, let alone the political and economic events of each site. Secondly, most of the world literature appears to be complicated and incomprehensible to typical youngsters. Because the authors come from different countries with different cultures, the readers may need a certain level of education to comprehend these works.
In conclusion, teaching the history and literature of a country for its young people clearly has benefits. And I completely agree that this should be included in the school curriculum.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 720, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...n might realize what they have nowadays was paid by the lives of the previous gener...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49319727891 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95092482666 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578231292517 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2114136775 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286606620805 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899907204379 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100085203365 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180324800284 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610242437818 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.