Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet. Others, however, believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that taking care of individual diet belongs to residents or the national authority is a subject of debate. While reasons can be given to justify the latter, the former is much more preferable.
On the one hand, there are strong reasons to think that governments could control the health of residents by intervening in the sources of food. The more rigorous national authorities control, the higher standards of food hygiene and safety are. If there are a myriad of requirements of food, the awareness of the food quality in the community will increase gradually. As a result, consumers have more decent choices in food, and then, make their health better. For example, Protected Designation of Origin, Protected Geographical Indication, or Organic are the niche markets gaining in popularity of intelligent consumers in today’s society.
On the other hand, others would argue that people have to focus on what kind of food in the daily diet they have. In recent decades, for those who are hard-working, they often omit their meals and replace them with fast food which is immensely harmful to their health and fitness. Only when people pay attention to the nutrients and chemical substances in the food they eat every day, does their lifestyle reap the benefits of their sufficient awareness. In addition, regardless of any levels of control the government could take, individuals have to make the right choice for their own lives. For instance, statistics have shown that there is plenty of children having obesity which is caused by an unhealthy diet despite the strict requirements of governments in Europe.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, although the government has to take partial responsibility for taking care of the food hygiene and safety, it seems to me that individuals place paramount importance on their own diet and health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... hygiene and safety are. If there are a myriad of requirements of food, the awareness ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15359477124 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78853932321 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565359477124 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2117395839 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.307692308 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256112552549 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913278644934 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757399805451 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160579490391 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776419662357 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.