Increasing number of hearth diseases among the population alarm modern society to live healthier. Undoubtedly, diet is the key to prevent many so called "population diseases". Although some people believe that authorities should encourage people to live and eat healthy, I, however, believe that it is about individuals.
Over decades we have been proven that power of government to encourage people living healthier failed. Take tabacco and cigarets for example. Proportion of printed warning on cigaret's packs increased in last couple years, and almost did not leave space to promote a brand. People are warn by realistic pictures of deadly sick individuals of harm caused by smoking, however, number of people smoking remained the same. Another way should be putting higher tax on junky food. However, making goods more expensive will not be a solution to tackle problem of obesity followed by population diseases. For instance, organic food. Since organic products reached grocery stores, their price remained exorbitantly high and people still buying them, even more than ever before.
On the other hand, I believe that live healthy is individual's decision and effort. Nowadays, many people have wide range of food allergies and as a result of this, they should be allowed to choose a diet which suits them the most. For instance, weight lifters. People who exercise in the gym and burning vast amount of calories twice a day, will not be able to balance their energy and nutrient's intake by diet which might be accurate to someone who wants to loose weight. Furthermore, promoting specific food such as avocado, bananas, milk and other, may not be suitable to every one, despite its merits.
In short, although authorities should make some steps to promote healthy lifestyle, therefore, on balance, I believe that choosing diet and how to live is an individual decision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ght be accurate to someone who wants to loose weight. Furthermore, promoting specific...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in short, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25742574257 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68083515039 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640264026403 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7615362653 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7058823529 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243548034268 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672672302809 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668101200077 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154576811437 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380934151022 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.