Some people believe that mobile phones should be banned in public, especially in public transport, restaurants and cinemas. Others think that people should be allowed to use mobile phones anywhere.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Cellular phones are considered one of the major breakthroughs in technology that accelerated these days’ means of communication. As this electronic device is handy and mobile, it is by no means certain that it can be found on every individual’s possessions. It is claimed by some that cellular phones should be prohibited in some areas, particularly in public places, while others believe that mobile phones should be used in many places, without prohibitions. This essay will discuss both of the above-mentioned arguments.
One on hand, public commuters who are carelessly using their cell phones increase the risk of theft incidents and road accidents, therefore, it should be prohibited when commuting. Moreover, cellular phones should not be used while a film in a theater house is ongoing, as these devices are becoming a medium of illegal acts as piracy. In addition, during a family or business gathering in a restaurant, frequent use of mobile phones affects focus and serves as a distraction, which makes the family member or colleagues’ presence only physically but not mentally. Having said that, it is somehow beneficial that the use of phones in some places should be in prohibition.
On the other hand, disallowance of cellular phones has its own risks and drawbacks. First, if mobile phones would be totally banned in these areas, the transferring of information during cases of emergencies would be disrupted. Second, it limits communication among business partners or family members who are not able to join the gathering. Third, one cannot consistently update their significant others regarding their current locations if cellular phones would be totally prohibited while commuting. Therefore, cellular phones should be allowed to use, anytime and anywhere, as it is not appropriate to ban the use of them, in serious circumstances.
Having elaborated both sides, in my perspective, the use of mobile phones in public areas should not be banned, however, rules and regulations should be imposed and applied to avoid the occurrence of untoward incidents. For example, public faculties can arise with a “Cellphone using Zone” where an individual can freely and safely use their cell phones when needed. In addition, “cell phone off” or “in silent mode” rule could be applied as it encourages respect among every user. Most importantly, responsible use of mobile phones should be every individual’s initiative, taking in mind that these breakthroughs in technology are helpful, only when used correctly.
In conclusion, the prohibition of mobile phones in some public places is an excellent idea for some reasons, however, it is not totally applicable in some circumstances. Therefore, in my opinion, certain rules and regulations, along with some limitations, and the responsible use of cellular phones should be taken more into consideration rather than totally banning this device.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 266, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...xample, public faculties can arise with a 'Cellphone using Zone' where ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2506.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 456.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49561403509 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19789180613 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493421052632 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 811.8 506.74238477 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0567501062 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.894736842 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42137802459 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14878145938 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996960903178 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27102503457 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185077009421 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.