It is often argued by the section of society that wrongdoers should be allowed to do unwages task to support the community rather than kept them in jail. However, I firmly agree to the given notion and think that unpaid work should be done by the prisoners to help the society in many ways.
Apparently, I believe that unpaid work should be allowed to do by prisoners to help community holds wide range of constructive benefits. First of all, it gives a change to evildoers to be a good person for a society. Even if someone is doing a great job upon unpaid tasks it directly helpful for society and also for that person. For example, there are many countries, which provides this kind of works to prisoners so that it can be helpful for their society as well as their country also. That’s why it is more important to allows criminals to do a job rather than kept in jail.
Secondly, doing a good work for society can also help divert the mindset of criminal from bad to good. In other words, there is a strong relation between doing a good work and mindset. For example, if criminals accept that this unpaid work is a charge of their bad thing that cause socirty then it is more helpful for them and as well as communities also.
To recapitulate, I strongly believe that providing unpaid tasks to criminals is more beneficial than to stay in the prison because it helps to the society as well as for country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... their society as well as their country also. That’s why it is more important to all...
^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ful for them and as well as communities also. To recapitulate, I strongly believ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the society as well as for country.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, as for, for example, kind of, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51550387597 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42732538798 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468992248062 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3020130484 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.909090909 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9090909091 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384067772305 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171576705604 0.084324248473 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100730543587 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251296236007 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107008887889 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.