Some people believe that technological developments have decreased crime. Others believe that crime has increased because of technology. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
A group of individuals opine advancements in technology havingbeen proven able in mitigating/uprooting crime.A contrary opinion also exists inferring to technology exhibiting/stimulating more amount of crime. If questioned, I’d like to put some elaboration for these sentiments and then shall provide my opinion in the ensuing paragraphs.
Focusing on the former belief, it is irrefutable that surplus technology does come with the benefit of helping in plummeting crimes. To begin with, these days the violation of certain rules can be instantly verified by the means of surveillance cameras(cameras are a major deterrent to crime) placed at every nook and cranny of city intersections. With the gizmos available these days, it has relatively eased the keeping of the evildoers and felons in check and under constant monitoring. Moreover, the social and political matters are in safe hands with the assimilation of computers in the matter. It is only because of the entrusted platforms and authorities ensuring our safety, that we are living very prosperously. To add to that, the medical field and forensics are thriving and developing the way never seen before to add to the benefits as a whole.
Moving onto the contrary view, it certainly is viable to not forget about the downsides of ever abundant tech and definitelyshould be taken in consideration as well. First and foremost, the cyber-crimes nowadays are a major issue that not only have people getting breached of their privacy but also getting wrongly turned their lives upside down by the frauds, scammers and so on. Besides this, there lurks a more prominent danger of world war because of the weaponry, terrorism and inter-territorial feud between dominant nations. For example, several bomb blasts,failed gun control, thefts and many more.
To recapitulate/conclude and give my opinion, I believe that technology acts as a catalyst in providing our safety, while also controllingthe unlawful activities at the same time. Although offenses or delinquencies are certainly possible to some extent, the future of enforcing the illegal acts out of our society is all the more attainable, thus; outweighing the benefits in the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A group of individuals opine advancement...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...oven able in mitigating/uprooting crime.A contrary opinion also exists inferring ...
^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , failed
...ations. For example, several bomb blasts,failed gun control, thefts and many more. To...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37101449275 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36403004931 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640579710145 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4999385296 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.357142857 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209200639814 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051988698408 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590150167049 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114984677303 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536222810515 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.