Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
With rapid development of economy as well as technology. We could see a huge improvement in our life where people are allowed to determine what to do within so many options. I strongly agree with this.
Modern society provides us with numerous choices in terms of education in contrast with the past where cultivation was the most important thing in order to feed the family. In other words, there is no concern about food anymore since it’s not possible for famine to happen with so well-developed agriculture, while almost everyone has the right to receive education. However, all of these could be imagined by people in 18 centuries. Therefore, from the perspective of education, many choices are offered to every member in this society.
In addition, due to the fast and powerful transportation system such as planes or high-speed railway, each person is able to travel or live anywhere in the world, leading to a wide range of choices of living as well as traveling. As it is efficient and cheap to use transportation tools, distance won’t be a concern for people in modern society, while it really put a limit on choices of people in the past.
Besides the convenience brought by advanced transportation system, the inventions of internet give us free and nearly unlimited access to information, resulting in plenty of options in our life. For example, without internet, the only approach to collect information might be talking to people directly or reading newspaper, which is extremely troublesome and not efficient. Yet, though internet, people now can have far more choices than before, since internet make worldwide information available to us.
In a conclusion, the significant advancement of economy and technology enable everyone to have plenty of options regarding education, work or traveling due to rising life standards as well as easier access to information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
- Thepie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected threere gionsof the world during the 1990s Summarise the information byselecting and reporting the main features and make com 78
- Countries are becoming more and more sim ilar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds o f meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Thepie chartbelowshowsthemainreasonswhyagriculturallandbecomes lessproductive Thetableshowshowthesecausesaffectedthreeregionsof theworldduringthe 1990s Summarisetheinformationbyselectingandreportingthemainfeatures and make comparisonswhere relevant 11
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, really, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18241042345 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96631271617 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615635179153 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0415473033 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.384615385 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195325136783 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746528883534 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643305349611 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106253479774 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079007356036 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.