Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Compared with the past, the availability of choices have enabled people to make an awareness decision. I completely agree with this assertion since we have chance to receive many choices. Basket food and purchase order are some factors involved.
For one, the food market is supplied with significant type of edibles which provides a good accessibility to people. Accordingly, all tastes coverage given particularly people who have an allergy to some food, such as nuts or even dairy products. In addition to this, special food products for people with specific disease are considered, like gluten free products for patients who suffer from bowel syndrome. Furthermore, non-seasonal products can be bought from food market irrespective of weather condition due to modernized preservation methods.
For two, it is common today, online order that makes life more simpler. Popularity of it among people assists them to choose better products and services. Customers can regularly surfing the internet for searching price and quality of the product before making any purchase decision. This option protects them to waste time and energy with actual impact. Besides, it would be so efficient for disable person to order what he/she wants and has conveniently buy. Therefore, people will have innumerable choices to get the greatest results.
In conclusion, it is obvious that increasing choices create many chances that nonexistent in the past. Not only these alternatives prepare a wide range of variety in many fields but also they could be helpful for people to obtain the suitable thing that they really need.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'simpler' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: simpler
...mon today, online order that makes life more simpler. Popularity of it among people assists ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... it among people assists them to choose better products and services. Customers can re...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'bought'.
Suggestion: bought
... what he/she wants and has conveniently buy. Therefore, people will have innumerabl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, furthermore, if, really, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37007874016 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71589630733 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677165354331 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7586460173 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193688520083 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656780715858 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725580514937 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12786080389 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871056008679 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.