Some people believe that Olympic games do not have a role to play in 21st century Do you agree or disagree with the given statement

Essay topics:

Some people believe that Olympic games do not have a role to play in 21st century. Do you agree or disagree with the given statement.

Olympic games play a magnificent role to uplift the standard of health, wealth and relationship. Presently, some proportion of masses consider that organizing Olympic events is supposed to be worthless idea and it has no contribution in this jet age of 21st century. Here, I would like to discord with the given statement.

There are multifarious points to support my point of view. First and foremost, arranging international sports like Olympic games allows many talented players to earn name, fame along with money at international platform.To be specific, players, nowadays are passionate to take part in such events to make the world record by revealing their exceptional talent and get their names published in the Guinness book of records in order to get popularity worldwide. Players not only glorify their families and countries status but also earn an insane amount of money. As a result, the role of Olympic games is phenomenal for players to lead prosperous lifestyle. What is more, organizing sports events internationally could be lucrative to create plethora of job opportunities. For example, a massive number of people from the different part of global visit to the host nation while arranging Olympic events. In this way, many taxi drivers, tour guide and workers get jobs in hotel and restaurants and they can earn back and belly.Hence, the idea of managing such games deserves appreciation and it is worthwhile for the individuals of host nations.

Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initially, Olympic games play a gigantic role to boost the economy of host nations. To justify, millions of spectators who travel to host country for watching live events bring hard currency for their accommodation, enjoyment, travelling and shopping. Therefore, host nation receives foreign revenue and allocate it for the progress of other sectors. Besides this, bridging cultural gap among nations is the result of organizing international sports events. To illustrate, players and tourists exchange their thoughts, ideas and feelings with locals during Olympic events. Thus, it could be fruitful to promote global friendship as well harmonious binding.
To recapitulate, sports have become part and parcel for every nation in 21st century. Undeniably, Olympic games bring few drawbacks for environment and mankind. However, I still believe that the importance of such games cannot be underestimated. Consequently, international sports events like Olympic have vital role in the holistic development of host country.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...ng with money at international platform.To be specific, players, nowadays are pass...
^^
Line 3, column 1026, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...urants and they can earn back and belly.Hence, the idea of managing such games deserv...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...or the individuals of host nations. Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initia...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43908629442 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98114463327 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57614213198 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.1373028737 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.047619048 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7619047619 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179666565246 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584656126024 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575298038541 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135363871176 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643783190231 0.056905535591 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.