Some people believe that the Olympic games do not have a role to play in 21st century. Do you agree or disagree with the given statement.
Olympic games play a magnificent role to uplift the standard of health, wealth and relationships. Presently, some proportions of masses consider that organizing Olympic events is supposed to be worthless idea and it has no contribution in this jet age of 21st century. Here, I would like to discord with the given statement.
There are multifarious points to support my point of view. First and foremost, arranging international sports like Olympic games allows many talented players to earn name, fame along with money at international platforms.To demonstrate, players, nowadays, are passionate to take part in such events to make the world record by revealing their exceptional talent and get their names published in the Guinness book of records in order to get popularity worldwide. Players not only glorify their family and country status but also earn an insane amount of money. As a result, the role of Olympic games is phenomenal for players to lead prosperous lifestyle. What is more, organizing sports events internationally could be lucrative to create plethora of job opportunities. For example, a massive number of people from the different parts of global visit to host nation while arranging Olympic events. In this way, many taxi drivers, tour guide and workers in hotel and restaurants get jobs and they can earn back and belly. Hence, the idea of managing such games is appreciable for the individuals of host nations.
Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initially, Olympic games play a gigantic role to boost the economy of host nations. To justify, millions of spectators who travel to host country for watching live events bring hard currency for their accommodation, enjoyment, traveling and shopping. Therefore, host nation receives foreign revenue and allocate it for the progress of other sectors. Besides this, bridging cultural gap among nations is the result of organizing international sports events. To illustrate, players and tourists exchange their thoughts, ideas and feelings with locals during Olympic events. Thus, it could be fruitful to promote global friendships as well harmonious binding.
To recapitulate, sports have become part and parcel for every nation in 21st century. Undeniably, Olympic games bring few drawbacks for environment and mankind. However, I still believe that the importance of such games cannot be underestimated. Consequently, international sports events like Olympic have vital role in the holistic development of host country.
- Nowadays many people work part or full time from home Some people believe that working from home has many benefits for mankind and society Do you agree or disagree with the given statement 61
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with young people for the same jobs What can be the reasons for this What would you suggest as a solution 96
- Some people believe that the Olympic games do not have a role to play in 21st century Do you agree or disagree with the given statement 84
- Some people believe that young employees are the most valuable for the company However others argue that older employees have more experience and knowledge To what extent do you agree or disagree with the given statement 92
- Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies white cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this. Discuss both the sides and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...g with money at international platforms.To demonstrate, players, nowadays, are pas...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...or the individuals of host nations. Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initia...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4498714653 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97491622607 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580976863753 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.1094922895 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3636363636 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6818181818 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181201432101 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565397731899 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571738070222 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135605924133 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641584905656 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.