Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generations companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire.
Do you agree or disagree?
Why?
It is believed that the elderly who are in higher positions should be encouraged to retire by the companies in order to provide more opportunities for younger staff. Personally, I agree with this opinion, which I will elaborate further in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the elderly are usually more conservative and reluctant to innovate. Their management skills and professional knowledge cannot keep pace with the rapid development of modern commercial society, which would result in losses in business. In contrast, young employees are more willing to accept new ideas and technology, they prefer to approach a task from different angles and try to find the most effective measure. Their existence in senior management could bring new opportunities to the company. For example, the elder administrative staff is used to use traditional marking strategies such as newspapers and billboards, while the younger employees are skilled in using social media such as Facebook and Twitter to advertise the products, which is a more effective and economic way of marketing.
Secondly, it is acknowledged that physical condition would go downhill as people grow old. As managerial staff, it is inevitable to work overtime. However, the elder employees are unable to work for a long time or complete intensive working tasks, which would impair the working outcomes.
Lastly, the senior managerial staff usually receives a higher salary which would be a financial burden to enterprises. If these job positions are replaced by younger staff with lower payment, large amounts of expenditures can be saved and being used in other fields such as facilities improvement or advertisement investment to facilitate the development of the company.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that younger generation should be given more opportunities in management level since enterprises can benefit from it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...products, which is a more effective and economic way of marketing. Secondly, it is a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51369863014 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0522441593 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6955418808 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.846153846 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121154892802 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444249541518 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616281915512 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809172363012 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692158524545 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.