In modern times, many countries around the world have trained many people into professionals in field of work such as doctors and engineers. While there are people believed that those professionals should stay and work at the country where they have finished their training, I would argue that letting those people travel to countries that they want to work will be more beneficial.
On the one hand, it is believed that doctors and engineers should work in the country that they have finished their training because it has to fit with the country environment. This is because many nations around the world have different illnesses and environmental condition that might need different training in order to cure a particular disease or construct a house that can withstand the harsh condition of that country. For example, in japan, building’s foundation have been reinforced so that they can withstand and combat low seismic level while in vietnam, the building will collapse since most of the house foundation are not heavily reinforced for earthquake.
On the other hand, I believe that it will be more beneficial to let professionals travel to countries that they wanted to work in. Much knowledge that they have obtained in their country are transferrable, which mean the knowledge and experience that they have accumulated in their country can be useful in the nation that they wanted to work in. This can help many nations around the world that lack profession such as doctors and engineers by letting them to work in those unfortunate countries. Hence, improve the reputation of the country and also able to form an alliance with the country that they had helped. For instance, software developers are able to work anywhere in the world since their knowledge are globally taught around the world, and in vietnam, the government had allowed many companies to outsource many of their employees to work outside of vietnam, which in turns improved vietnam reputation in many countries around the world.
In conclusion, although there are people wanted professionals to stay and work in the country where they have finished their training, I believe that letting them travel to the country that they wanted to work will be more beneficial.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 7.30460921844 301% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10298102981 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68382454664 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.409214092141 0.561755894193 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1129120658 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.181818182 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5454545455 20.7667163134 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420812423164 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209661585116 0.084324248473 249% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140150084209 0.0667982634062 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31998543637 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882778195753 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.