Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Books are an ocean of knowledge. Many people say that reading books are more useful than playing games and watching TV. I agree with this phenomenon.
To begin with, Learning from books is more effective way compared to TV and games. To understand the concept, children have to give their attention to the content and to do this children built their concentration. Stories in books can inspire children's imagination, creativity and critical thinking.
Moreover, From reading different stories, children can imagine the scenes from words and think. Furthermore, reading stories also helps children master language development, as by reading stories, children learn pronunciation and vocabulary. Reading devlopes children's ability to express themselves more confidently, easily and clearly in spoken and written terms.
On the other hand, the knowledge dissemintaed by vivid pictures on screen is easier for children to imbibe, but too many moving objects and colorful images can distract children, especially some young kids, from other important tasks. Playing coumputer games alsocan be very addicting, as a result of which children fail to do their homework.
In conclusion, it can be reiterated that reading stories in books is better than watching TV and playing on computers, as it is a more effective way to learn and is better for health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...heir attention to the content and to do this children built their concentration. Sto...
^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uter games alsocan be very addicting, as a result of which children fail to do th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 211.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43601895735 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83898519385 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592417061611 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7695531231 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5833333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397684521597 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137505126852 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862580641936 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223255649667 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639582972044 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.