Some people believe that students in schools learn better when they study in groups Others say school students learn better when they study on their own Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that students in schools learn better when they study in groups. Others say school students learn better when they study on their own. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Learning in a modern technology has become more valuable. Few of the citizens consider that students will study superior when they study together. Others, however, think that studying as an individual, student will learn exceptional well. This essay intends to look into both perspectives.
However, I side former view.

On the one hand, learning in a group, pupil can aid each other whoever face any difficulties in any of those subjects. So, by this, they will give interest to those particular subject. For instance, if adolescent study in a group of 10-12 students then they can share some idea and knowledge to each other instructed by tutor. Also, if any of school children misses out an any chapter thought in the class then they can discuss particular subject by the students who was presented in the class.

Looking to another side, learning at an individual level has also some benefits. Firstly, cannot get distract compared to study in a group. Take study together as an example, studying in a group pupil receives much noise created by other students. But in this case, they cannot distracted by other pupil because at learning at individuality level no one can distract them. Secondly, learning at alone can make more convenient way because students can studying immediately without until others are ready. Here, school children do not have to wait until other students arrive. In addition, they can start whenever they want. Last but not least, they can study whichever subject they want and they can create their own schedule and they would not depend on others when learning at their own.

In conclusion, learning together and learning at own, both have some advantage. However, I believe that learning together is the most effective technique because pupil share idea and knowledge of them with each other and also intelligent children solve the problem of student who may face any problem in any subject at some point.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owever, I believe that learning together is the most effective technique because ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04968944099 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53790370386 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531055900621 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.4798338792 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5789473684 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391910765858 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123816565268 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778964002729 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199920984776 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963102908177 0.056905535591 169% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.