Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all schools subject but others believe that they are good at or that they find the most interest. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is expected that pupils should try to learn various subjects in their schools while other people hold the view that children should be taught based on their talent. I personally think both views should be considered in students education. In this essay I will shed some light from both sides and extend my support before arriving at conclusion.
Concentration on school subjects are believed to be the accurate way for teaching students. Firstly, despite the fact that every person has different attitude and talent, different skills and lessons have offered via schools which a great deal of time should be devoted by students to rehearse them. Not only are these lessons though freely to students but also these subjects somehow are golden opportunities. A good illustration for this view is deprived children who have not enough facilities to find their talent, thereby learning different subjects give them chance to finds interests.
In contrary the above argument, some people have highly insisted on the view that children in school should focus on their interests. Although children can follow their tendency via university and future work, it is more beneficial to follow interest from school levels. Due to this fact that life is shorter than which people want waste their precious time on different skills. Therefore, if students focus on their tendency and capacity they will achieve better result in their future profession and career.
In conclusion, with considering to above explanations both views are acceptable and reasonable. Combination of these notions should be attended by educational systems in every levels.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...ould be taught based on their talent. I personally both views should be considered in students ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30888030888 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63394615857 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583011583012 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7579348623 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.769230769 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243109074338 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835919125684 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052343317493 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134182419656 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475550442623 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.