Some people believe that those who prefer books can develop more imagination
and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV.
There has been a belief that reading books is a better way for people to improve their imagination and linguistic skills than watching television. I somehow agree with this opinion. From my point of view, books can evolve people’s creativity, and language skills are developed effectively by watching and reading.
To begin with, book readers create images in their head based on what they read in books in lieu of particular characters and scenery shown on TV. For example, if a man is depicted in a fiction book, readers imagine the man's looks, clothing and behavior. However, a TV show presents all visual pictures with visual scenes and music.The process of transforming words into images or clips in our brains strengthens neural connections, which is a form of mental training for our mind. As a result, reading is a more proactive kind of brain stimulation than viewing.
On the other hand, both watching TV and reading books play a significant role by enhancing vocabulary and pronunciation. TV with sound effects and accents may effectively assist viewers strengthen their listening and speaking abilities, thus their language coherence improves. Otherwise, books contain a wide range of words and complex grammar which can improve their lexical resources. People may enhance their vocabulary and learn new grammatical structures and how to apply them efficiently by reading regularly.
To conclude, reading books have benefits in imagination flow in comparison with watching TV while books and TV have different advantages in evolving linguistic skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...l pictures with visual scenes and music.The process of transforming words into imag...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, while, for example, kind of, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35080645161 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87110082602 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637096774194 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1979442748 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.583333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210649181808 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818512112949 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644180432706 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143736052453 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641828201073 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.