Nowadays, participating in voluntary work has a paramount placement. Some, including me, argue that free activities such as helping poor people should be a mandatory program for high school students. In this essay, my point of view besides supportive explanations will be provided.
Firstly, it could be the duty of schools, where are the most pivotal places for educating children, to teach them the fact that some activities such as gathering money for poor people are priceless. In other words, the best way for encouraging children to be part of voluntary activities is making them aware about the main purpose of these works, and it would be possible if consider this item as a part of school curriculum. Therefore, not only students and their teacher would be involved with this plan, but also their family stay behind their children to inform them about the incredible results of these activities.
Secondly, giving the opportunity to younger for having responsibility could be a critical issue. If schools force students to cooperate in activities, they can face the societies’ problems. In fact, this enforcement in addition to showing the importance of the subject gives them an opportunity to think about others as family members and they could be more responsible about the people who are living with and beside issues in the future.
To sum up, however enforcing students could have opposite results in almost many situations, I firmly believe that it would be better if it becomes a compulsory unit of pedagogical programs because students would be more responsible and get familiar with the crisis that people face with them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, such as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16044776119 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82342883563 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59328358209 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0067330311 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.3 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 7.06120827912 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209980697669 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878970407102 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651198289333 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126631939577 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491592210989 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.