Despite the agricultural development, due to overpopulation and natural resources depletion, many people are facing with the shortage of food and eatable resources. In this essay, the above problems and the solution of them will be explained.
Firstly, the main responsible for the increasing the number of hungry people would probably be the population explosion. This issue causes many problems such as lack of enough clean water, food and fuel. Overusing farming land for producing more food ingredients and industrial human activities, which affects the river and oceans, are the result of overpopulation. Thanks to the cutting-edge technology, farmers instead of using the old method of agriculture, can farm on vertical lands and changing the infrastructure of cities to plant and nurture crops on the top of residential buildings are the most effective ways for solving the previous situation.
The second reason of food insufficiency is natural resources depletion, which is rooted to deforestation and loss of bio-diversities. For creating road and cities, many trees and jangles are ruined and as a result causes extinction of species and habitats, which took millions of years to perfect. For instance, a special type of wheat that was healer and important ingredients for baking bread in 1900 are scarce nowadays. Developing the science of genetic modification and internationally cooperation among scientists might be an effective way for controlling reduction of natural wealth.
To sum up, although increasing population and decreasing natural resources are crucial reasons for hungriness, revolutionizing the technology such as vertical farming and genetic modifies are hope for solving or managing the mentioned problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...ment, due to overpopulation and natural resources depletion, many people are facing with ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...reason of food insufficiency is natural resources depletion, which is rooted to deforesta...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, so, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63117870722 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2153859249 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604562737643 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6282535124 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.636363636 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104882548914 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466812460586 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544287744839 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069267808128 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595124988043 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.