Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sport to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that community service without payment should be made compulsory for high school students. I completely disagree with this view due to the restriction of a student’s time and to the undesirable output by students that a compulsory policy may bring.
On the one hand, as a full-time student, a teenager already has a limited amount of time as much as an ordinary nine-to-five worker does. Apart from attending classes in school hour, a typical high school student is time and again preoccupied with the colossal amount of homework assigned by nearly every teacher. Besides, the pressure of constant examinations coupled with the need for creating a good-looking academic record by having to be involved in extracurricular activities literally render them exhausted. Thus, it is virtually impossible for students to overtake one more activity which is regarded as compulsory. It would be more feasible if the amount of their spare time is to be spent either for their recreational activities or with their family and social circle.
On the other hand, the output of work produced by students through this kind of policy may well be under-standard or undesirable. Firstly, instead of spending their time playing computer games with friends, they have to take part in an activity which does not them any financial rewards but also deprived of their precious time. This, in the long run, will be likely to cause resentment and condemnation among teenagers. In consequence, they tend to contribute half-heartedly, bring about the unproductive results which would be otherwise better if done out of their own volition. It may be argued that there would be a performance appraisal after a task has been done. However, no one will expect that a punishment will be imposed on those did not reach the given standard. Therefore, quality of work would be unlikely to be improved, or even worse, would gradually be declined.
In conclusion, it is neither sensible nor practical to oblige high school students to do unpaid work. This will not be in the interest of both students and society as a whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with their family and social circle. On the other hand, the output of work pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08045977011 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93651729697 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5478598628 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184990738816 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068740920949 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795211851185 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137521659448 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636632414235 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.