Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sport to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that community service without payment should be made compulsory for high school students. I completely disagree with this view due to the scarcity of a student’s time and to the undesirable output of work that any kind of compulsory policy may bring.
On the one hand, as a full-time student, a teenager has a limited amount of time as an ordinary nine-to-five worker does. Apart from attending classes in school hour, a typical high school student is often preoccupied with the colossal amount of homework assigned by nearly every teacher. Besides, the pressure of constant examinations coupled with the need for creating a good-looking academic record by involving in extracurricular activities literally render them exhausted. Thus, it is almost impossible for students to overtake one more activity which is regarded as compulsory. It would be better should the amount of their spare time is spent either for recreational activities or with their family and friends.
On the other hand, the results produced by students through this kind of policy may well be below standard and undesirable. Firstly, instead of spending their time playing computer games with friends, they have to take part in an activity which does not give them any financial rewards but also deprived of their time. This, in the long run, will be likely to cause resentment and condemnation among teenagers. Consequently, they tend to perform the job half-heartedly, thus bringing about the unproductive results which would be otherwise better if done out of their own volition. It can be suggested that there would be performance appraisal after a task has been done. However, no one will expect punishment to be imposed on those who do not meet the given standard. Therefore, quality of work would be unlikely to be improved, or even worse, would gradually be declined.
In conclusion, it is neither sensible nor practical to oblige high school students to do unpaid work. This will not be in the interest of both students and society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies or with their family and friends. On the other hand, the results produced ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13213213213 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88628740414 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606606606607 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9372425856 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8125 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196344832011 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070427771631 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795471869853 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144813528704 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730264865741 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.