Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action.
It is argued that environmental issues are not successfully dealt with by individuals, whereas others believe that it is impossible for the government to resolve these problems without individual efforts. I believe that such problems are only successfully dealt with by concerted efforts of both the government and its citizens.
On the one hand, individual citizens do not have the resource and authority to successfully protect the environment. Firstly, many of the desires to make environmentally sound choices of citizens are not fulfilled in reality. For instance, decisions to switch from commuting by car to public transportation are discouraged by the fact that such changes will take more time and convenience away from the commuters, for buses or trains are not well-developed and invested in most countries. Secondly, environmentally conscious decisions will continue to be expensive unless there are some actions from the authority. Despite being aware of the importance of living a plastic-free life, alternatives to plastic products are still costly and, therefore, out of reach to most people. Therefore, unless businesses choose to sacrifice part of its profits to go green, and provides cleaner offerings, leading a no-plastic life remains most people’s last option.
However, the government alone cannot tackle environmental problems. Any schemes introduced to the public should be well received and implemented at a household level if environmental protection is to be guaranteed. For example, a tree-planting scheme is not powerful enough to reverse climate change if just superficially conducted by the government. It should be every individual or, at least, every home’s agenda to have more green space across the nation. Another example would be the campaign encouraging more cycling to and from work. Without any real action from every person, the initiative will not make any difference to the environment.
In conclusion, the government and individuals should go hand in hand to protect the planet. In the absence of any party, it will be impossible to solve any environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ection is to be guaranteed. For example, a tree-planting scheme is not powerful e...
^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le to solve any environmental problems.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53067484663 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24438965141 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567484662577 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8210619892 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6875 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2539594859 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814731101724 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650855842211 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14989066092 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363304561896 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.