Some people believe that what children watch on television influences their behaviour. Others say that amount of time spent watching television influences their behaviour. Discuss both views and give own opinion
Due to the fast-paced development of technology, specifically display and streaming services, more considerations are taken into account about how to utilize such innovations in a way that maximizes the youth well-being. Some argue that the longer the period kids spend in front of a screen, the more harm they would take. Others, however, believe that the content which youngsters enjoy is the main factor to determine the impact. From my point of view, I agree with the latter statement that what children watch play the more influential role.
First of all, there are various ways in which the period can influence adolescents. By allocating an appropriate amount of time to online channels, they are likely to gain advantages over those who do not. For example, if students spend 30 minutes speculating a sports game after a heavy-studying day at school, they will eventually feel less stress, and thus be more productive the next day. Nevertheless, over-abusing stream services could generate many dangerous effects. Health issues, such as obesity, laziness and distress, might be one of those outcomes, which consequently damage kids’ performance at schools in particular and society in general. In other words, the control of time spending on such devices contributes considerably towards youth’s conducts.
Despite the above arguments, content appears to create much more significant outcomes in the long run. The topics entertained by teenagers could gradually cause misbehaviour that is difficult to modify in the future. Watching violent and offensive movies, for instance, might provide them with distorted perceptions that lead to misdemeanours. In contrast, positive programs, especially those in education categories, play a key role in developing early-age pupils. By enjoying linguistic videos from Youtube, they would spontaneously develop the ability to understand that specific language, which would be an imperative advantage for them in subsequent time. Meaning that watching materials not only have immediate impacts, but also lingering ones.
In conclusion, whereas the hours using televisions might result in noticeable consequences, the influence from the topics is more substantial in the long terms.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, in general, in particular, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1902.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61061946903 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02829910222 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678466076696 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7847756384 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.882352941 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4705882353 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107851364163 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318485270017 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355658664025 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664637553592 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019276098779 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.