In some countries, the number of people who visit art galleries is declining. What are the reasons for this? How can we solve this problem?
Nowadays, people, especially the youth, are becoming less interested in literature shows. This trend, unfortunately, expands dramatically due to today fast-paced world. In this essay, I will discuss the causes of this phenomenon as well as the effective solutions in order to tackle it.
First of all, there are various reasons that have contributed to the decrease of art enthusiasm among society. One of those would be the boredom impression students feel from attending required history classes at school. Because of the heavy pressure on theoretical knowledge and score, pupils have a tendency to learn by heart just enough to pass exams. Consequently, they perceive art-related products, such as canvas, ancient excavations, are tiresome and even scary. Additionally, as the interest has created many breakthroughs technologies, individuals no longer have an incentive to visit historical exhibitions in person. Smartphone, for instance, can generate a massive amount of breathtaking and realistic images of statues at home for people. In other words, it is more convenient to enjoy artworks at home rather than having oneself commute long distance and taking considerable preparation for galleries.
Despite such restrictions, some methods can assist to better the situation. Government intervention would be a substantial measure. By establishing significant and popular events nearby museums, the state thus improves the number of tourists come to the areas and builds the attractiveness for these galleries. At the same time, more policies should be implemented to encourage more outdoor activities embedded with traditional learning to make a positive impression about historical products for the young generation. Furthermore, museums can simultaneously reconstruct their infrastructures with more entertainment means such as cinemas, theatres and shopping mall, which directly develop customer services. Family, for instance, are more likely to have sightseeing in dinosaur galleries after watching the Jurassic Park movie.
In conclusion, although people are not as fascinated by art as they used to be, several approaches can help to improve this circumstance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-06 | tanthao123456 | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | sanjay marwaha | 92 | view |
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 83
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 89
- Some people think that kids should be sent to nursery school before primary while others think kids should be kept at home with family Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn a lot of money Others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80373831776 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21865504482 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.704049844237 0.561755894193 125% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5629930033 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.588235294 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189179831538 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506615956832 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463604982638 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115258837399 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331451751862 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.