Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from history in their own country. Why is this? How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their own famous people from history?
Along with the growth of mass media, there are more and more people such as movie or pop stars that their fame among youngsters spread internationally. Consequently, it is believed that children nowadays only know about these stars but have very little knowledge about the historical characters in their own country. This tendency has resulted from several reasons. Luckily, there are some actions can be taken to help young people to gain more interest in their own famous people
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations about this indifferent attitude. First of all, there is an unsuitable way of approach. There appear to be shreds of evidence that while movies or pop music are popular among teenagers, historical figures are rarely mentioned except for a few documentaries which are very jejune and dogma. In the second place is the generation gap. The major achievement of the great people has gained in the past. As a result, it is difficult for youngsters to have sympathized and admiration with the historical figures. Last but not least, young people these days are said to have a hectic lifestyle with a dense curriculum. It is self-evident that they do not have time to learn about these people. Furthermore, there is no community or forum for the youngster who is passionate about
Nevertheless, there are numerous viable solutions to raise the student's interest in this topic. The first one is to make historical figures more familiar and popular among young people through films and media shows. By way of illustrations, China's motion-picture industry is very developed thanks to its great historical and national hero films. Secondly, the government should set up museums and encourage children to visit them by subsidized their tickets. The Vietnam Museum of Ethnology, which has student discounts, is a good case in point. Finally, the school can incorporate the diversity of teaching techniques. This is shown by matching traditional teaching format with audio-visual aids or organizing educational trips to famous historical places
To sum up, the low interest in historical figures among youngsters is due to the unsuitable approach, generation gap and lack of time. However, some actions can be taken to solve this problem as making more film about this topic, establishing and discounting museums tickets or combining different teaching techniques
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, except for, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25260416667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89798705881 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549479166667 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1538614494 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.157894737 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57894736842 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409889252736 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103660386296 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119964899601 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261443096715 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20542957799 0.056905535591 361% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.