Some people believe that young people know about international pop and movie stars but know very little about famous people from the history in their own country. Why is this? How can more interest be created in young people to gain more knowledge about their own famous people from history?
It is true that while famous people such as worldwide pop and movie stars are followed mostly by the youth, they have less information about historical figures of their nations. In my point of view, entertainment interests always take a big part of youngster’s attention but there are some actions that can be made to attract their awareness in historical people.
The entertainment field is developed rapidly nowadays, in many countries and young people are likely to know about pop singers and movie stars. The ubiquitous appearance of pop stars is showing their mesmerizing performances on stages or screens is so appealing to people that those celebrities become a role model for the young. Furthermore, such catchy songs and comedy films can help them relax and unwind stress. As a result, they will be dragged to look further into their idols’ life and it will become natural to know more about international pop and movie stars.
However, enhancing people’s knowledge about famous people from the past can bring more interest in the subject of history. Firstly, the young who are always in need of brilliant examples to follow can connect with renowned historical figures by understanding their great virtues and their achievements through films and music. Investment in the dual product of entertaining and educational movies should be taken into consideration. In addition, instead of learning history lessons in traditional ways, people have come up with board games inspired by historical events and characters which make players know about the historical people's insufficient way.
In conclusion, in the modern world, young people have a tendency to know more about international stars due to their entertainment preferences. However, adding the element of practice, diversity, and entertainment into historical education can be a promising resolution to this matter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | Hoàng Anh Minh | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | Hoàng Anh Minh | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | sangeeth28 | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-29 | haphuongpham49 | 73 | view |
- Many foods are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 89
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is in this case Is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The line graph below shows the cases of diseases caused by the X virus in Australia from 1960 to 1995 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40878378378 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96392780962 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584459459459 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6187742196 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.416666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487674766204 0.244688304435 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176538057954 0.084324248473 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125510766566 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30082197858 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575469608097 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.