Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefits of human beings. While other argue that is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Today we live in era where human race develop themselves and societies enormously. With self improvement somehow our actions are also causes for inventions of new diseases and viruses. To protect human race, some people believes that mankind should use varmint for research and experiment purpose to develop antidotes of different new diseases. On same view some individuals denied to accept and protest against use of animals for medical research. This dissertation will explain both the views with suitable examples before forming my opinion in following paragraphs.
There is a group of thinkers who consider and accept that humans should use vertibrates for medical researches. There are lots of viruses which came from animals and are seriously vulnerable for mankind. For example, Plegue came from rats, birdflue came from chicken, and very recently corona virus came from cobra a well known species of snack. All this diseases are very harmful and they are enough capable to cost individuals life and therefore, use mammals as a research object can helps medical experts to find absolute solutions of this diseases.
Besides this, there are lots of people who affirm that animals are not to be used for research purpose. As humans, varmints are also live things and they have feelings. Researching and experimenting on wild things gives them pain and sometimes it cost their lives. One research paper known as DNA concludes that genetics lab uses hundreds of rabbits and rats for experimenting their serum or antidotes or vaccine before launch in market for human treatment purpose and that experiments takes hundreds of lives of this beef animals. Human being have to find options for medical research and experiments rather than using animals.
To conclude, in my opinion human life is more precious than wild live things and thats why human being should use animas as research material. However, as human we also have to learn to give respect them and taking care of poor animals as they are also a living thing as us humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'denied accepting'.
Suggestion: denied accepting
...diseases. On same view some individuals denied to accept and protest against use of animals for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...obra a well known species of snack. All this diseases are very harmful and they are ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...e, use mammals as a research object can helps medical experts to find absolute soluti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...l experts to find absolute solutions of this diseases. Besides this, there are l...
^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...more precious than wild live things and thats why human being should use animas as re...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12275449102 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51491481262 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0770679009 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318519101172 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11537934069 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868215873307 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195575099004 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544186303139 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.