Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Advocates of that idea argue that residents when being in obligation would pay more attention to recycle rubbish. For example, under the pressure of being fined providing that they do not distribute their rubbish to distinct categories, they would be more aware of this action. In addition, factories which are directly responsible for recycling trash would work more efficiently if they have to follow some qualities made by experts from governments. However, new laws would take a great amount of money to be enacted officially, and there are several plausible solutions, which the governments would pay less money, could be pragmatic and effective. In addition, people would feel annoying when the threats of paying fines appear daily.
I support the view that newly enacted laws could not be the only way. Firstly, governments could commence with educating juveniles who are the next generation because they fast learn new lessons. A case in point is that classifying rubbish would have been in their instinct if, in their childhood, parents have taught them it is their responsibility. Besides, another solution could be for authorities of societies that money should be spent on improving the recycling system, specifically factories.
In conclusion, a legal requirement for recycling would have some significant merits, but it would own drawbacks and also consume unnecessarily a great deal of money from tax.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35714285714 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84141527842 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629464285714 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2944016369 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173011561292 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743563304856 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033258489221 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120429727412 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146826457297 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.