The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.

The graph demonstrates ten nations which produce and consume the greatest amount of electricity in 2014. The striking feature is that the volume of production was higher than that of consumption in nearly all ten countries.
More specifically, the China’s figure ranked first, with 5,398 billion kWh for the production that was marginally higher than the consumption at 5,322 billion kWh, followed by the United States which owned the second position supplied 4,099 billion kWh for the inhabitants who expended 3,866 billion kWh. Similar pattern was observed for Russia, Japan, India, Canada, France, Brazil and Korea, Rep but their amount was much lower by nearly a fifth of that of China with the volume brought up from around 500 to approximately over 1000 billion kWh and the expenditure was almost all under 1000 billion kWh.
A nation that showed a dissimilar pattern was Germany, with 582,5 billion kWh of consumption which is slightly greater than the amount German made by 55,9 billion kWh.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arginally higher than the consumption at 5,322 billion kWh, followed by the Unite...
^^
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the volume brought up from around 500 to approximately over 1000 billion kWh and ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20245398773 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61093223622 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 54.0 22.4926829268 240% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 315.892738477 43.030603864 734% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 282.666666667 112.824112599 251% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 54.3333333333 22.9334400587 237% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0859758928623 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821882403647 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210275924322 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756418059439 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043136140705 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 30.2 13.2329268293 228% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 33.59 61.2550243902 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 10.3012195122 214% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.77 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.06136585366 130% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.6 10.9970731707 215% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.0658536585 217% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.