Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Environmental issues have always been a heated topic and often discussed. It is claimed that people do not recycle enough waste from homes . They believed that imposing laws is the only way to increase personal recycling . From my perspective, I partly agree with this opinion due to several reasons below.
On the one hand, a strict restriction imposed on recycling behavior might be an effective way to immediately reduce a large amount of waste. According to Vietnam general statistic office, about 70% of household waste could be recycled. For example, plastic bottles, cans or paper could be transferred to recycle factory to produce new ones . Organic waste could be used as fertilizer for plants, food for pets or raw materials in manufacturing other products. In addition, having a law of classifying waste is necessary. Instead of storing everything in 1 trash can, which makes it unable to be recycled, people can classify it themselves and make these progress easier. Take japan as an example of excellence in recycling . They have laws which make them classify their own waste such as electronic devices, organic waste, solid waste, .... As a result, 70% households waste is recycled . Others is burned to produce electricity.
On the other hand, I believe that it is not the only way to increase recycling. Numerous feasible alternatives could be done to solve that problem. One of them must be education. We can teach students of how to make profitable items from household waste. For instance, plastic bottles and cans can be used to make lovely tree plots, paper can be used to make decorations,... Another alternative is to avoid using unrecyclable production like plastic bags, straws or cups. Then the recycle progress would be much more easier.
In conclusion, one of the most effective way to increase household recycling is to impose strict restrictions on the way we do to rubbish. But I believe that is not the only way solving that issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e do not recycle enough waste from homes . They believed that imposing laws is the...
^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... only way to increase personal recycling . From my perspective, I partly agree wi...
^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...only way to increase personal recycling . From my perspective, I partly agree wit...
^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d to recycle factory to produce new ones . Organic waste could be used as fertiliz...
^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sary. Instead of storing everything in 1 trash can, which makes it unable to be r...
^^
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fy it themselves and make these progress easier. Take japan as an example of exce...
^^
Line 3, column 725, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...as an example of excellence in recycling . They have laws which make them classif...
^^
Line 3, column 845, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evices, organic waste, solid waste, .... As a result, 70% households waste is rec...
^^
Line 3, column 892, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...result, 70% households waste is recycled . Others is burned to produce electricit...
^^
Line 3, column 911, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lds waste is recycled . Others is burned to produce electricity. On the other...
^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... education. We can teach students of how to make profitable items from household ...
^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...s, paper can be used to make decorations,... Another alternative is to avoid usin...
^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aper can be used to make decorations,... Another alternative is to avoid using un...
^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to avoid using unrecyclable production like plastic bags, straws or cups. Then ...
^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...traws or cups. Then the recycle progress would be much more easier. In conclu...
^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...hen the recycle progress would be much more easier. In conclusion, one of the most eff...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onclusion, one of the most effective way to increase household recycling is to im...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05846153846 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83435536583 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566153846154 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8537459057 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4782608696 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1304347826 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91304347826 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 5.01903807615 339% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319048199885 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966014759517 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101645598287 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203694042365 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748534229458 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.