Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
Do you agree or disagree?
At present, many people believe that there is not enough waste from homes recycled. While it is often thought that the only way to solve this issue is for governments to make a recycling law, i strongly believe that there are other solutions
In my opinion, governments play a pivotal role in forcing citizens to recycle. The reason why is they can put many strict laws into practice such as recycling fees which helps people to take more responsibility for their actions. Besides , the state is the only one to introduce people widespread that the importance of recycling for their life by enacting a law.
However, as well as government requirements, we have also many ways for this problem. First, education is a sustainable solution which makes people to recycle waste more from housings. Especially, children who is instructed several steps for recycling at home can acquire a lot of enviromental knowledge and learn how to protect our earth by this way. Second, the state could launch green campaigns. This not only attracts attention from citizens but raises their awareness about recycling as well. Last but not least, social media is also an ideal way to get messages across people. Thanks to the breakthrough of technology, those messages can have access to all the ages about the need of recycling waste which affect significantly on their health but also the lung of the earth.
In conclusion, the role of the government making people people recycle is undeniable. But there are also abundant solutions for this problems that we need combine with this key above way to solve more productively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...esponsibility for their actions. Besides , the state is the only one to introduce ...
^^
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: people
...sion, the role of the government making people people recycle is undeniable. But there are al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...t there are also abundant solutions for this problems that we need combine with this...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97769516729 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70933204125 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579925650558 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.467114795 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294001558263 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11320400864 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715845263502 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200482328165 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627447520607 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.