Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requierement.
To what extent do you think laws are needen to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is often argued that the amount of rubbish from households recycled is not enough. It was suggested that the only viable solution for the problem is a legal demand. The essay supports that the law may lessen the waste problem, but suggests that this is not the only way to force people to recycle more.
A law which forces people to give their waste for the recycling more often indeed may be very effective, because not all citizens are concerned about the preservation of the environment. Such a law may be the most efficient way to coerce people to take care of the nature, because the requirement cannot be circumvented if the authorities would watch over its realisation. Finland provides a great example. The counry has recently enacted the law which restricts the dumping of different kinds of rubbish (so one should only bring glass to glass, plastic to plastic etc.) in some districts, and there was a great success in nature’s convervation after the law’s beginning.
Nonetheless, obligatory rules are not the only way to cope with the waste issue. The problem might be alleviated if the government would educate and foster people in such a way that they will be deeply concerned by the state of nature and pollutions. If one thinks about the nearest forest’s destiny while dumping a glass bottle with an iron can together, one will likely put the items in appropriate vats, which, in turn, helps to separate the rubbish in future. For instance, in Russia, a lot of social advertisement is being translated via TV and radio, and the amount of waste differentiated in a proper way is increasing every day.
Overall, though the obligatory demand of rubbish recycling is a very effective way to control the waste problem, others methods can be implemented, such as the increasing of people’s concerns about the environment with mass media programms.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 2, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...way to force people to recycle more. A law which forces people to give their wa...
^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he dumping of different kinds of rubbish so one should only bring glass to glass,...
^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... in turn, helps to separate the rubbish in future. For instance, in Russia, a lot of soci...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... and the amount of waste differentiated in a proper way is increasing every day. Overall, thou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nonetheless, so, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95886075949 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84160123249 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550632911392 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4183841811 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.538461538 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270931766131 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989558876458 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700234890179 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178292294893 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056163388912 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.