Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is agreed by some individuals that modern style construction in urban areas should be under government's regulation. Others, however, oppose that project's financial provider must have their right over designing pattern of the building. This essay will depict several interesting ideas from both sides and share my personal opinion about the statement given.
On one hand, it is mentioned by opposite side that the owner of the development should be free to design his own project. Most inventors will definitely agree with the point. It is because they pay for a budget to operate the construction to fit in the way they prefer. In real estate business, Siam Paragon, the largest shopping center in Bangkok, could provide a great instance. If the local authorities declare land use policy that affect their planned development negatively, the operator will either stand for their right, or shut down the project. Therefore, whoever finance a building construction ought to be able to design their plan freely.
On the other hand, it is said that governments shall provide a proper regulation to control the design of the towers in big cities. Without a policy, the town may consist of diverse building pattern which does not illustrate sense of community. Provided there are no legal limitation is this issue, it would contribute to many political, social, and environmental problems to solve. So, they agree that the authority should regulate the pattern and purpose of constructed building.
Personally, I believe that there will be some plausible solution to overcome this issue. In real estate market, there is a project called mixed-use development. This development was first established in the United States to redevelop urban area and create suburb development hub. The survey conducted by ULI suggests that mixed-use area benefits the surrounding community and allows a person who hold the ownership, to use his creativity to make the project pedestrian-oriented and environmentally friendly under the regulation declared by local authorities. it, thereby, is my perspective that government shall allow the owner to design while partly control some issue.
In conclusion, as the argument mentioned earlier will still be a dilemma situation among those who argue. There is a possible way that work out for both views. A planned mixed-use development is that possible solution. With its advantage on surrounding neighborhood under governments' control, the finance provider will be able to generate the synergy inside to work systematically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ting ideas from both sides and share my personal opinion about the statement given. On one ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 560, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...gulation declared by local authorities. it, thereby, is my perspective that govern...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38902743142 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96493312155 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57855361596 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6282998522 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2272727273 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2272727273 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273663162472 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744018939728 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760628669214 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145171159154 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379135381816 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.