Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that advertisements either supply audience with amusement or irritation, and the marketing instrument do not effect shoppers anymore. I mostly agree with the notion as the role of advertisement has been downplayed due to a paucity of creativity and manipulation of some ads.
Ads are rampant on the internet and daily life these days, many of them try to mislead users or exaggerate about the actual impacts of products and services. People thus start to develop prejudices agaisnt advertised offerings and have tendency to avoid the offerings that are associated with the ads altogether. Another downside of advertisements is that they tend to be repetitive. So irresponsible some advertising agencies are that they are likely to milk monotonous patterns to assiminate messages to final customers. The approach which has already become obsolete in the marketing world not only shackles the creativity of maketers but erodes the brand images towards their customers.
Admittedly, there are some innovating advertising campaigns that render customers at awe while smoothly delivering the idea of manufacturers or service providers to customers. The ads of Nike, a footware giant could evidence this. The company has skillfully utilized Michael Jordan to endorse for basketball shoes, which helped the firm reap billions of dollar. However, such startling advertisements are not common these days. The advents of the ground-breaking method like Nike’s are few today.
In sum, I somewhat agree with the view that the influence of advertisement has on buyers is jeopardized. Deception and repetition contribute largely to the phenomenon, even though few campaigns can be successful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...on, and the marketing instrument do not effect shoppers anymore. I mostly agree with t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51724137931 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13135365752 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647509578544 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7967412264 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189839763974 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584987375154 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536109437907 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101659980975 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307930725147 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.